He’s back! The happiest, sleaziest and most popular cocksucker in America.
Shrines celebrating his oral skills have been erected in just about every port, village and metropolitan area of the nation.
And now he’s taking on the Big Easy. Yes, it’s Treasure Island Media’s Damon Dogg in New Orleans!
When Damon learned that religious fanatics and cops were trying to shut down the sex and wild times of the annual Southern Decadence event, he announced that it was his duty as a bone-suckin’ cum-swallowing Dogg to get down there and do his part to keep the sex tradition alive.
And we love him for it.
Don’t miss a messy, slurpy drop in our latest video series in the Inner Circle’s Treasure Island Media theater.
Thank you Damon!
©2007 Nightcharm
Love him. No one blows meat like Damon Dogg! Ahhhhh woof woof!!!!!!!!
I’m glad YOU at Nightcharm weren’t going all hysterics-Chi-Chi-style about TIM. I love them, and WE know what is good.
Even if we don’t do it ourselves.
I too want to re-confirm my support for Treasure Island.
Even though I have lost friends in the eighties and early nineties.
And still have a lot of others that are positive.
Maybe I’m just more attracted to guys who have a relaxed attitude about sexuality.
Condoms just are a major turnoff and tight assed ness even more.
Maybe that’s also why I got poz myself earlier this year.
I’m not regretting it.
The chances of dying from a traffic accident are at this moment (according to Dutch ministry of Health, link ) 20 times higher then unsafe sex. Chances of dying from over eating are 40 times higher, chances of dying of smoking are 200 times higher.
Wrote and illustrated a separate section on my weblog where I try to get my thoughts together on this on (link)
But don’t follow me on this unless you’ve thought good & hard and really made up your own mind.
I’m sorry but this kind of porn just makes me uncomfortable. it’s like i can feel the syphilis seeping through the monitor. I don’t really understand the whole total domination thing.I can understand the urge to be controlled every once in a while, but seriously, letting yourself be so degraded like that guy does just speaks poorly about your nature. I’m just wondering when our community is gonna do a one-eighty and start looking to regain some respect. Stuff like this is just gross
How sad that any gay man would view the semen of other gay men as infected with syphilis. Have we been brainwashed to the extent that we subconsciously believe that having sex causes disease? When every drop of cum you see is a harbinger for death and suffering, then the Religious Right has won.
Take back sex and take back loving each other’s bodies. Fuck the fear mongering media. And don’t buy Chi-Chi LaRue’s films. She does more to perpetuate gay self-loathing than any talking head on Fox!
As a proud New Orleanian, I’d like to thank Treasure Island Media for keeping my city on the sodomy map.
As a devoted fan of cockgobbling, I’d like to ask ‘em why I wasn’t invited to the goddamn party–although I suppose they have to draw the line somewhere.
Censorship is wrong in any form but by far the worst is self-censorship. TIM puts out hideous product for the most part(IMHO) they thrive on erection killing performers like Damon. I had the misfortune of seeing him in person once (at Folsom St. Fair). Jack-o-lantern teeth in search of an orthodontist are not erotic to me at all. Get used to the Chi-Chi brand of craptastic porn she owns over 50% of the production now.
Just because we “can,” does not mean we “should.” As AIDS and STD infections soar in the U.S., with Big Pharma, Transgressive Pornographers, and Kink Extreme misrepresent a lethal disease as “chronically managed,” perhaps we should RESPECT the biological facts, not turn away in DENIAL.
If individuals get HIV in this day and age, it’s not because they’re naive, it’s because they demonstrate unfathomable self-loathing, self-destructive behavior that invites a premature death. Even the Ryan White Funds are unlikely to continue at this rate. Talk to some AIDS and PWA survivors, and ask them about their “sex life” after infection — many already at “salvage” status. So “transgressive,” no?
When I beheld several thousand friends, customers, and loves die from the pandemic in the 1980s, I respect NATURE enough to be smart, not just “take it,” because I “can.” Too many survivors CANNOT take anything, with oral, penile, anal cancers; diarrhea; torn rectal walls; neurocognitive dysfunction; erectile dysfunction; etc. You promote this END. Why? Are you self-loathing queer who does not respect NATURE either?
Since Chi Chi CAN’T, she finds the “transgressive, risky, and dangerous” behavior of others so wig-twisting her twit. She loves the FIST, the humiliation, the degredation because she’s impotent. Sick in the head usually leads to sick in the flesh, and vice versa.
When the right man comes along, makes you tingle with chills up and down your body, then you two can choose smart condomless sex. Unsafe sex before that moment merely illustrates a complete self-loathing and internalized homophobia no different than political toilet-tappers and sex pigs searching dark rooms and public parks. Worse, actually.
The unsafe don’t even expect to live for the right man. Their FATE is already sealed. Just another meth snort, take 100 guys up the ass, and wonder ever after if it was really worth it? The self-loathing precludes even that assessment.
by no means do i fear every drop of semen that i see. But if i know that the semen is from a man who has fucked or been fucked by a good twenty guys in the past hour, I’m going to be a little suspect. As should anyone. I don’t understand this backlash against safe-sex. Seriously, self-preservation over self-gratification any day. What’s your life compared to a tiny difference in sensation? I don’t care what anyone says, safe-sex or at the very least knowing who is fucking you is simple logic and personal responsibility.
and by the way, montex, that statement was simply ignorant. Whether or not someone has a sexual disease that is carried by semen has nothing to do with the religious right, it’s a matter of health and caring for your body. Where did you get the religious right idea from?
I find both Damon Dogg and Dawson hot but what they do is gross. Total turn off with all those numbers of strangers, who were for the most part nothing special to look at,feigning they love drinkin strangers’ cum…yech. Truly unerotic and dangerous. Why would they? How empty.
For the biological facts, taking cum in the mouth is generally not infectious, lest one has a STD, which is sure entry for HIV to follow in tandem. Herpes is just as vulnerable.
However, since most gay men learn of their HIV status months, if not years, after infection, the first six months of HIV infection makes that particular partner very infectious in all situations, including super and re-infection.
Unless the partner has practiced safe sex all along, been tested every day for six months, neither he nor you will know for sure his infectious status. Now, the University of California, San Diego, confirms that bareback serosorting is more liable to spread HIV infection because the variables are too unknown for any reliability, save Russian Roulette.
Readers are welcome to consult some of my posts, like Gay Sex in the Age of Microbes — which oddly gets more straight readers than gay ones. No one denies diminished sensitivity with condoms, nor condom fatigue. But many gay men seem in in total denial — as if AIDS is a chronically managed disease that frees one from all concerns.
I assure readers that is NOT the case; not only the virus, but the ARVS, detrimentally affect everyone’s life — the promiscuously infected on drugs notwithstanding. Since the plethora of opportunistic infections has made many HIV gay men miserable, I remain stunned that our community promotes ARVs (antiretrovirals) as a satisfactory “just in case.” Just be prepared to give up your sex life, spend hours near toilets, take drugs to offset the side effects of ARVs, and masturbate (assuming ED does not occur — which it does in 95% cases).
The purpose of this post is not to strike fear, but to strike responsibility, and to promote healthy, joyful homoeroticism. Gays die daily from AIDS despite the queer press’s claim to the contrary. Bristol-Meyers would love for you to spend %15,000 on the drugs (x 3 remember), and some politicians would love for you to be wholly dependent on the state’s largess. It is ONE option, but an option I highly discourage.
The LAST thing any sensible gay man wants is to find the love of his life, and for one, or both, to DIE because of irresponsible behavior promoted by queer profiteers. As my lover boldly insists: Being gay is not a license to be stupid. (It is still subject to dispute.) After our 25 years, who would know if either of us died?
Does Chi Chi and her fellow pornographers care? She cannot even get it up. You may need her wigs after staring ARVs, but your cock sure won’t work, and the anal lesions will make the other option off limits. At least you fed her transgressive, risky, bottom line. Consolation for an alcoholic kinky mayor and his transgressive porn industry — but not gay affirming. Maybe PlanetOut’s extortion of the “queer” market will laugh all the way to the bank, but dead gay men don’t seem to have the same sense of humor. The grave, like Chi Chi, is pretty fuck’n cold.
There’s nothing hysterical or self-loathing abouth harboring a certain fear about sex today. A fear response is natural and it’s what protects us. You wouldn’t just ingest any substance because it looks pretty or tastes good. Pragmatism isn’t a bourgeois compromise we’ve been scared or tricked into; it’s a necessary adapdation to a serious change in the word. The greatest lie of all is that HIV is no longer something to feared and that contracting it is some sort of initiation into the Club of The Liberated.
It’s not 1970 anymore and it may never be again.
Gry, I vehemently reject your choice of words. Sex, or homoeroticism, is never to be feared. Homoeroticism is an extraordinary joyous pleasure we prize — especially when it comes together in romantic love.
But intimacy, one of the most joyous human aspects of “mating” (no other species does it), and it requires (i) life, (ii) health, (iii) ability. Each of these three prerequisites is significantly compromised by a retroviral microbe named HIV.
It’s the microbe, not intimacy or sex, not the semen or saliva, not the cock or the ass, etc., that is deserving of suspicion, a healthy fear, a respect for its lethal abilities in the Red Queen of Nature. But it is the microbe, never the hosts it rides, nor the “streams” on which it flows, that is to be feared.
We all know safe-sex practices, and everyone has a moral duty to himself and to others to practice safe sex until one bonds with his Beloved. Only someone lacking self- and other-respect would injure himself or another by wreckless behavior. If you speed 130 mph on a motorcycle while high on meth, don’t cry to moma when you bust your ass and head wide open.
Because of HIV and increasing numbers of untreatable STDS, the sexual freedom of the Sixties and Seventies is OVER in the one sense: All unsafe sex outside of a bonded love MUST be safe, so that when the bond occurs, the microbe will not take your Beloved from you. And I’ll be the first join in celebrating the event.
Mr. The Gay Species, I must say you’re being a bit pretentious. All Gry was saying that fear created by the irresponsible actions is a legitimate fear. Even thought I do kinda disagree with his wording, there is no need to bite his head off. And there is no need to go into the microbiology lecture, all you had to say was that we need to fear the virus not that action that transmits it, which I also disagree with. If you let yourself get wrapped up into that intimacy before protecting yourself, you could easily find yourself getting carried away and disregarding the safety measures. As long you protect yourself from the get go, you can enjoy everything else afterword.
PeKeMo:
Reasonable people will reasonably disagree. I’ll accept the “pretentious” assessment as valid from your perspective.
Gry’s “There’s nothing hysterical or self-loathing abouth harboring a certain fear about sex today” has been similarly expressed before. I cannot imagine a healthy, positive gay man using one, let alone all three, of these loathsome phrases in one sentence: “self-loathing” and “hysterical” and “fear of sex” in any positive sense.
But you seem no less “hysterical,” if you do not mind my pretentious assessment of your comment: “I’m sorry but this kind of porn just makes me uncomfortable. it’s like i can feel the syphilis seeping through the monitor.” Wow! Seriously? Do you really have such a visceral reaction to semen? Do you know how syphilis is transmitted?
Perhaps you can point out my “microbiology lecture,” since my point is simply that microbes (in general) are a part of our life, and respecting their presence obviates the need to look at human semen as “diseased.” I don’t believe I brought out virology, bacteriology, parasitology — only acknowledgment that these critters coexist with humans.
I am second-to-none in recommending safe sex, so “fear” would NEVER have to be an operative concern in my or any gay man’s lexicon; but I’m right there with most gay guys enjoying the bodily fluids and parts that make gay men (and many straight women) enjoy their men. Riding tidal waves is too extraordinary to make pathological.
I cannot imagine a gay man looking at cum shooting from a man’s life-giving center in any other way than “love drawn out” and spread among the orgasms of life. (It is the vitality of life itself, I trust you know?)
But you write that you see “syphilis as shooting through your computer screen” from a man’s cum explosion, and then YOU insist I am being microbial, but that the syphilis you see seeping through your monitor’s semen is NOT evidence of self-loathing?
Perhaps I am “pretentious” (I prefer respectful of nature and my partners). But I am not a self-loathing, semen-averse, syphilis-contaminated, creepy-eeky male afraid of men’s wonderful assets and properties. Believe me: Cum shots do not evoke syphilis and disease jumping through computer screens — and it was this comment that provoked my original response.
Safe-sex obviates taking these “hysterical” stances. And, yes, I do respect NATURE enough to understand she is very much attendant in my every move I make — even if I cannot see her little critters riding tidal waves. But to make Semen into the Rocky Horror Picture Show or the Goon from the Lagoon seems to me, at least, too melodramatically horrific beyond what the biological facts allow.
Roosevelt once said: “We have nothing to fear but fear itself.” Respecting Nature is not fearsome, but rather RESPECTFUL, but imagining enemy spirochetes on every ebb and flow of the man’s human tide will do serious damage in the mind’s eye. If your language was supposed to be read between the lines, what happens in between the sheets?
first off, please tell me where in my original post did I mention semen? When I made the statement i was referring to the situation and Damon and his brand of porn in general, so please don’t misquote me by saying my distaste for this act was based solely on the “semen” factor,which in fact had nothing to do with it. And now I must insist that you are being pretentious simply because you feel as if you have some idea of what my posts meant. You obviously do not, if you think i have some illogical fear of semen and can literally see seeping through my laptop screen. Let me put this more on your terms of speaking, my statement about the syphilis seeping through the screen is what we call a Hyperbole, an over-exaggeration or overstatement. It’s a device used when we want to emphasize a point. My statement had nothing, absolutely nothing to do semen, it was about the fact that I believe that what Damon does and the places he does is degrading and unsafe and irresponsible,I don’t know why other’s felt the need to inject the word semen into it but hey, the material is interpreted by the reader. Either way, i don’t care if you don’t agree with me, you’re entitled to do so, but don’t fuck with my words and think that you have the upper-hand, especially when they’re is proof that you’re wrong just a mouse-scroll upwards.
Simply, I find “fear” a very poor motivator that often gets resented. The Invasion and Occupation of Iraq, for example, was achieved solely through fear-mongering. The motivation was wrong, and none of the reasons right. Using fear to achieve behavioral ends rarely works, just as fear or prisons has deterred crime or illegal drug use.
I was fortunate 35 years ago to have a father-physician advise me on learning of my gay awareness in a couple of gay-healthy approaches. He reminded me of peristalsis, the health hazards of rimming, and the value of hygiene in sucking cock that has just fucked ass. No fear, just an appraisal of health consequences — and not guarantees, but predilections.
Unfortunately, even these many years later, I am surprised how little health-positive information we share with each other. Instead, we tend to oscillate between denial or over-reaction. The same is true of HIV. No one knew of HIV in 1980, and many died not because of stupidity, but because of complete ignorance. And yet, such a simple measure as slipping on a condom goes very far in solving the world’s largest pandemic since the 1917 influenza.
For whatever reasons, the U.S. citizens seem to detest knowledge about science and of anatomy, physiology, biology, and microbiology. Yet, we can watch hours of pornography or read dime-store novels about gay love incessantly — some depicting unhealthy intimacy — or no intimacy at all.
Having a sense of our bodies and minds in the biosphere, how it is part of its own ecosystem niche, elicits howls of “microbiology lectures.” No lectures. Just the facts. We are not alone, and knowing the company enhances, not fears, the interplay between us.
“If you speed 130 mph on a motorcycle while high on meth, don’t cry to moma when you bust your ass and head wide open.”
So is it the act of speeding or the meth intake that proves deadly? Your earlier protracted logic relating to intercourse would fault the ultimate impact of the crash as the problem and not the conditional factors leading up to it, except you contradict yourself here.
It seems like it’s the complex cause and effect relationship of outcomes (as well as the fact that you can’t grasp that PeKeMo was using a figurative expression and not a literal “Videodrome”-style Body Horror experience) that are ruffling your feathers.
Honestly, I reject your convenient logic, affected faux-guru tenor, “Scooby-Doo” speak (”creepy-eeky”? Really?), and deigning to claim that those who don’t buy into your opaque diatribes are somehow paralyzed by fear of others and/or disgusted by their own bodies.
A dose of self-loathing is just what the doctor should prescribe you, if only to spare the rest of us more of your mind-numbing and self-aggrandizing jive.
i just wanted to say that if you don’t like it, don’t watch it. as far as I can see, there is really no porn out there that is a celebration of male sexuality. TIM has all these guys taken loads and slurping out of cups, etc…the big studios feature hairless, preened, viagara popping muscleheads. it’s all a bunch of shit really. i’d rather go down to the local bar and have a couple of beers with people. my imagination is better than any porno.