The Last Tan Line: A Whiter Shade of Male

By Shawn Baker / Thursday, September 17th, 2009
trueblood_tan

Beauty is the cruelest of task masters.

When it comes to the Pretty Principle, enough is never enough. Between all the body-sculpting, aerobicizing, waxing, hair coloring, moisturizing, and airbrushing, the building of the perfect beast is beginning to wear us down. There’s a quagmire of products that promise to augment your lips, thicken your eyelashes, or brighten your smile, all of which are supposed to unlock some hidden potential you lack in influencing people.

Now, never once has a smile — essentially an involuntary facial reflex we’ve ascribed a social magic to and that any sociopath can flash at will — won me over, nor have I ever noticed another person’s teeth when I meet them. Men will buy penis enhancement pills and women have tried creams that purport to enlarge their breasts, but if I applied that logic beyond genitalia and offered you a product that could, say, increase the length of your arms or legs, would you buy it?

It’s the beauty mandate called tanning — more than even steroids — that I loathe the most. As a lifelong paleface, I’ve been made privy — always without asking — to casual urgings that I should get some sun to make myself more appealing, the implication being that fairness makes you some sort of of photosensitive albino who dwells in darkness with a cadre of bats and mushrooms as your sole companions.

One barely-casual acquaintance (a cunt) I encountered in a gym (wherein everyone always looked as if they’d just traipsed in off the Aegean seashore year-round) advised me that I looked positively anemic and waif-like. All the while I simply took in the extremity of his sun worship and marveled how, at maybe thirty-six, the pores on his arms were craterous, his skin had the tone more so of adobe than sunkissed, and he was developing bastard lines that ran from his eyes down to his jawline.

How weirdly paradoxical the obsession with epidermal beauty is; it would be the nadir of tactlessness to suggest that a non-caucasian should lighten his skin — those who would or even do are viewed as the ultimate of sell-outs — yet we who are naturally fair are pressured to alter our pigment as if it were nothing.

Northman_gay_tan

All of us can certainly relate to encountering people who’ve opted for the Dermoblast 4000 treatment (call it the John “Recession Be Damned! I Say Bronze!” Boehner effect), ample evidence that the line between glamor and farce is razor-thin. How many generic urban tans can you pass by in the span of a single block?

Three things for the edification of the UV-inclined courtesy from those of us who are translucent: first off, our skin is more sensitive than yours, meaning we have to be more cautious around certain soaps, detergents and antiperspirants; next, Scandinavian or Northern European ancestry allots you less tolerance for heat; finally, tanning may have evolved into a cosmetic principle, but all the finesse doesn’t erase the reality that it is and always will be a biologically imperative response to the potentially deadliness of the sun’s intensity in which our skin (actually an externalized organ) toughens itself to fend off damage.

You can understand how the notion of cooking myself Luau pig-style in what amounts to a UV-blasting coffin might not send me in the same way it does you.

Yes, I have the Viking blood in my veins. I’m not ashamed. Along with the extant urge to rape, pillage, and slay the stray ice vurm, it’s been very kind to me: I’m 6’2, ice-eyed, I was born with klieg-light blond locks, I have full lips, broad features, legs that go from here to ya-ya, strong bones, and smooth skin.

Sure, there are debits. The last place I want to visit for a vacation would be a tropical setting with beaches and pools. My scene veers more toward the windblown streets of Oslo or Copenhagen. In the tough urban summer months spent on steaming asphalt, I sport mainly tanks, not to flaunt my physique, but because anything heavier makes me feel like I’m wearing a fucking suit of armor. I can count on one hand the number of times I’ve felt cold in my life.

I keep my heat turned down low in the winter, and sleep with a fan next to my bed even in January, a benign quirk that caused one bemused love interest to compare me to a Newfoundland that could happily lie in a snowdrift than next to a roaring fire. The Newfoundland dog breed has historically been used for cold water rescues and fishing. They’re very comfortable in extreme cold. When I was little, my neighbors had one and the sexy bitch would lie in the snow and sleep.

Admittedly, my taste runs toward the darker and swarthier Mediterranean type, but it’s more the attraction to physical difference than the desire to become what catches my eye that accounts for that. I could stand in a chamber and be bukkaked by a dye-spraying gun or baste myself in fake tanner to get that fab naugahyde sheen, but it would also require plenty of hair color, dark contacts, and follicular facial hair transplants to even remotely make me resemble some stubbly, olive-skinned Hungarian from a Csaba Borbely flick.

It’s just way too much upkeep, and being an irksome rationalist when it comes to everything — from politics and religion, to career and relationships — I know that the beauty industry is centralized around fighting everything natural about yourself in order to futilely transform yourself into something you can never reasonably be. Just as I’m too lean-muscled and long-limbed to ever look like a Chelsea Guy without the aid of anabolics, I will never be able to conform to the cliché “Tall, Dark, and Handsome” aesthetic. Tall, Fair, and Pretty is more my speed.

All fads reach their saturation points, and while the well-publicized health risks aren’t likely to push the trend over the line, a new standard of sex symbol hood may encourage the Fellowship of The Sun to dial it the fuck down, or at least keep it to themselves.

Credit non-stop summer obsession True Blood and its two resident vamp bitch magnets Stephen Moyer(opening photo) and Alexander Skarsgard(above) with their gorgeous corpse pallors for turning the hackneyed notion that bronze-fleshed equals hot-blooded on its head.

For those of us who prefer to move by moonlight, you can color us grateful.



  • R(J)izz

    God, this is so true. I’m OVER the tanned look, and pity the guys I see now (approaching 40) who blew out their skin just for the ‘dark’ look at the White Partys. Horrible. And sad. Like the author, I celebrate my paleness. And will look fantastic into my 50s. The best revenge.

  • Vaughan

    To all Viking descendants and men alike out there. You are as perfect as you can be. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. Or do I have to remind you of the fact that in India and Thailand bleaching cream is a top seller and even small kids at the age of six start to tell their Moms they didn’t want a dark-skinned housemaid to get hired?
    I like red vixen (which sounds like the German word for wanking off) and foxes too. Barbarossos can be so yummy, and well not only the physique is important. Well not all of them are tasty, but often I do like everything that I’m not. If I’d be into types like myself (dark hair, dark eyes, quickly gets a toned skin color), I could go f*ck myself instead.

  • actually

    You said about how people are never told to be lighter – this is a myth. In the Asian world, it is about being lighter, brighter, and less yellow. And in the African world, there can be a looking down on people who are really dark as well. Each culture has it’s own idea of beauty and it is usually not what the people are born as. That said though, tanning is ok if it’s fake and not crazy chemicals used.

  • shawn baker

    I didn’t go so far as to say they weren’t implicitly pressured in the West; I just expect your average person Stateside would be less inclined to casually assert that a person of color would look prettier lighter and that they should find a way to go about doing it. There would be an ugly connotation there. It is a bizarre contradiction here in the States. Much of the Right Wing hubbub around Barack Obama does essentially come down to pigmentation — the notion that whiteness = a pure-blooded American seems to forever rear its head — and yet tanning as a leisure activity is all about altering that whiteness. How often is it viewed in the same manner as the examples you use? I suppose that tanning is proof of disposable income and the time to waste it, but it is perverse that many caucasians put copious amounts of effort into synthetically achieving the very skin tone that’s so often implicitly or explicitly alluded to as a danger sign that racial boundaries are breaking down.

  • David

    Liked the article and rather agree with it Shawn though luckily because of my mixed heritage I’ve never really been subject to the things described. I’m primarily Northern and Western European stock with Southern European, Native American, and some Southeast Asian in me as well. My overall look tends to be a tall, lanky type with an olive complexion, broad shoulders, full lips, etc. That being said I find it both amusing and somewhat sad that people always tend to think that the grass is greener on the other side when in reality it’s usually the same regardless. It’s all simply a matter of social conditioning and expectations I suppose. We all tend to have our aesthetic preferences in life, but in the end true beauty comes from within and moves outward. Whilst it’s nice to have outward beauty, if one doesn’t have inward beauty to compliment it, then all is for naught. As for those blokes who have neither…more’s the pity. Cheers mate. =)

  • http://mrelife.blogspot.com Adam

    So true, that I’ll just throw away my self-tanner!

    I’m a blogger too and I’d like to take the chance to introduce my blog to you, fellow blogger. It’s basically a journal of my experiences. I hope you enjoy it, because I certainly enjoy yours!

    Thanks,
    Adam (mrelife.blogspot.com)

  • Matt

    1) I agree that tanning is becoming a symbol of affluence- look at how in victorian times, it was all about being waif-y and pale to show you didn’t have to do any outdoor manual labor, now tanned and toned shows you have the $$ and the spare time to tan and have a gym membership/work out

    2) The idea that lighter = better still exists in some parts of the black community here in the US… it’d be totally taboo for someone outside of the community to tell someone to get lighter and there’s even some of the appropriate rejection of it by people inside the community but it still exists.

    3) I’m mostly Irish and my mom side is the Scandinavian type, you know red hair and freckles and the whole bit. I got pretty dark hair somehow but still that Irish complexion, and used to do the whole tan thing, til my mom got malignant melanoma. Now my days of chasing the bronze are over. Oh, and the wrinkles from sun damage aren’t touched by botox either, another goo reason to give up the goat. But I never realized my intolerance of heat was from that! I’m the same way- I can’t understand how anyone can wear long sleeves/pants when it’s over 75 degrees.

  • bats :[

    Wow, this is great! I’m a native Arizonan (well, born here, not American Indian), and when I chat online, invariably I get “you must sit out and tan a lot!”. Well, no. When I can see the Arizona Cancer Center at the UA from my house and know that Tucson has the second highest skin cancer incidence in the world (Brisbane, Australia, gets the top honors), no thanks. I’ll stay inside. (And when the temps over 100 F, why the hell do I want to be outside?)

    The notion of suntanned as healthy is 20th C as well. Prior to that, anyone with a tan was working class, out in the fields, mucking around for a living that was lived better by the upper classes.

 
©2013 Nightcharm, Inc.; All Rights Reserved.